Abuse of Market Dominance
관련 업무분야
관련 업무사례
A company that has market dominance in a relevant market (“market dominant company”) is prohibited from abusing its dominance by unfairly determining, maintaining or altering the prices of goods or services, unfairly regulating the sale of goods or provision of services, unfairly interfering with the business activities of other companies, unfairly preventing new competitors from entering the market, unfairly engaging in transactions to exclude competitors, or engaging in actions that significantly detrimental to consumer interests.
Kim & Kim provides comprehensive advice to clients on abuse of dominance, the most common type of anti-competitive conduct, through systematic analysis of intricate legal regulations and thorough market analysis supported by economic analysis.
In recent years, there has been increased international cooperation among competition authorities in regulating abuse of market dominance. Kim & Kim's antitrust practice leads the way in analyzing and applying cases from overseas competition authorities to help clients in mitigating antitrust risks. Leveraging our profound understanding of individual industry markets, we assess whether the behavior in question constitutes an abuse of dominant position and provide guidance on self-defense strategies to handle competition authority’s investigations and sanctions.
Kim & Kim provides comprehensive advice to clients on abuse of dominance, the most common type of anti-competitive conduct, through systematic analysis of intricate legal regulations and thorough market analysis supported by economic analysis.
In recent years, there has been increased international cooperation among competition authorities in regulating abuse of market dominance. Kim & Kim's antitrust practice leads the way in analyzing and applying cases from overseas competition authorities to help clients in mitigating antitrust risks. Leveraging our profound understanding of individual industry markets, we assess whether the behavior in question constitutes an abuse of dominant position and provide guidance on self-defense strategies to handle competition authority’s investigations and sanctions.
A company that has market dominance in a relevant market (“market dominant company”) is prohibited from abusing its dominance by unfairly determining, maintaining or altering the prices of goods or services, unfairly regulating the sale of goods or provision of services, unfairly interfering with the business activities of other companies, unfairly preventing new competitors from entering the market, unfairly engaging in transactions to exclude competitors, or engaging in actions that significantly detrimental to consumer interests.
Kim & Kim provides comprehensive advice to clients on abuse of dominance, the most common type of anti-competitive conduct, through systematic analysis of intricate legal regulations and thorough market analysis supported by economic analysis.
In recent years, there has been increased international cooperation among competition authorities in regulating abuse of market dominance. Kim & Kim's antitrust practice leads the way in analyzing and applying cases from overseas competition authorities to help clients in mitigating antitrust risks. Leveraging our profound understanding of individual industry markets, we assess whether the behavior in question constitutes an abuse of dominant position and provide guidance on self-defense strategies to handle competition authority’s investigations and sanctions.
Kim & Kim provides comprehensive advice to clients on abuse of dominance, the most common type of anti-competitive conduct, through systematic analysis of intricate legal regulations and thorough market analysis supported by economic analysis.
In recent years, there has been increased international cooperation among competition authorities in regulating abuse of market dominance. Kim & Kim's antitrust practice leads the way in analyzing and applying cases from overseas competition authorities to help clients in mitigating antitrust risks. Leveraging our profound understanding of individual industry markets, we assess whether the behavior in question constitutes an abuse of dominant position and provide guidance on self-defense strategies to handle competition authority’s investigations and sanctions.
-
업무사례
-
-
Fair Trade
공정위 대리해 대웅제약 제기 시정명령 취소 소송에서 최종 승소 확정 판결
2024-07-08 -
Supreme Court Reversal and Remand
미쓰비시전기 상대 시정명령 및 납부명령 취소사건 환송심 승소
2024-07-08 -
Other Cases
교량 저작권 침해 청구 소송 승소, 한국저작권위원회 감정결과 완전히 뒤집어
2024-07-08 -
Legislative and Regulatory Consulting
환경부, 배기소음기준 강화 정책 저지
2024-02-29 -
Legislative and Regulatory Consulting
조선산업 발전을 위한 주요 현안 간담회 컨설팅
2024-02-27 -
Defamation and Online Reputation Management
악성 댓글로 경쟁업체 영업 방해한 알집매트 대표이사, 법정구속
2024-02-26 -
Fair Trade
하림 소속 계열사 특정기업 부당지원 및 부당이익 제공 관련 행정소송 승소
2024-02-26 -
Fair Trade
구글 코리아 운영체제 선탑재 관련 2200억 원대 과징금 부과 관련 행정소송 승소
2024-02-26 -
Supreme Court Reversal and Remand
시티은행 입찰담합건 대법원 승소 (파기환송)
2024-01-31 -
Fair Trade
대웅제약 21억원대 과징금 부과처분 취소 등 공정위 대리(일부승소)
2024-01-31
-
Fair Trade
-
미디어 속 지음
-
-
[베스트 로이어]‘OS 골리앗’구글 상대로 완승 거둔 법무법인 지음 구글에 2000억 과징금 부과한 공정위 처분 ‘적법’ 판단 이끌어
2024-04-04 -
PD수첩 1413회 기업살인과 댓글부대
2024-04-03 -
‘OS 골리앗’ 구글 2000억대 과징금 ‘적법’ 판결 이끈 법무법인 지음
2024-03-11 -
[판결] 미단속 보고서 허위작성 혐의 경찰관들, 무죄 확정
2023-11-30 -
공정위 작년 로펌에 238건 소송.자문 의뢰...최다 수임은 '지음'
2023-10-01 -
“네이버, 스마트스토어 밀어주기 위해 알고리즘 조작”... 공정위 ‘266억 과징금’ 부과 정당 입증한 지음 법률사무소 김종용 기자 조선일보 로펌의 기술
2023-01-11 -
1위 공정거래위원회 행정소송 사건 수임 (민간부문) 김진원 기자, 리걸타임즈
2018-10-17
-